Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016    Login | Register        

Commissioners squabble, delay action on GOP nominee

An issue that normally would be as straightforward as one could imagine for the Fayette County Board of Commissioners launched a lengthy discussion with no resolution at the Jan. 28 regular meeting.

The commissioners do not have direct oversight of the county’s Board of Elections, but the law requires them to vote on the acknowledgement of nominees to that board and complete the process for filing certification at the state level. The three-member election board includes one member each nominated by the county’s Democratic and Republican parties as well as one appointee from the Board of Commissioners.

The certificate of approval for Darryl Hicks to be reappointed as the Democratic Party nominee was granted by a unanimous vote with no discussion. His new four-year term began Feb. 1 and will expire Jan. 31, 2020.

The Republican nominee process was not as simple. The nominee in question was Aaron Wright, who would serve the same term dates as Hicks.

Chairman Charles Oddo said he was not comfortable with casting a vote “without an official letter” from the county GOP. He noted there was a letter dated Jan. 20 on the party’s letterhead announcing Wright, but the board had also received a separate letter from some party members asking for another candidate, and that letter had been placed on the dais the day of the meeting. That name was not mentioned during the discussion.

“There is some disagreement within the party right now,” said Oddo.

Commissioner Steve Brown stressed that he didn’t want the board “managing a political party,” adding that the members have their own recourse if they are not satisfied with their own process.

“If they want to duke it out, they can duke it out in Superior Court,” said Brown, noting that such action had just recently taken place.

Brown also noted that the Republican Party officials had given them detailed lists of the actual votes taken by specific voters according to precinct. “I don’t know how we can say that’s not legitimate,” he said, adding that delaying this vote could impact the party’s effectiveness in light of qualifying for 2016 races scheduled for March.

“I see no urgency in letting them have two more weeks to determine this among themselves,” said Oddo.

The chairman was unmoved when Wright addressed the board in person, referring to himself as the “clear” nominee of the Fayette County Republican Party. Wright said 31 total precincts were heard from in the vote, which he won 22-9.

“You have a letter on the dais signed by the chairman of the Fayette County Republican Party,” said Wright, adding that party officials were informed by county staff that everything was in order in comparison to how the Democratic Party submitted their paperwork.

There is no county committee meeting scheduled before the next Board of Commissioners meeting, Wright noted.

“The information in front of you is the information that will be in front of you at your next meeting,” he said. “It is very clear.”

Oddo held firm on his stance and made a motion to table the matter until Feb. 11. That motion passed 3-2 with Brown and Randy Ognio voting against.

In another matter concerning the Board of Elections, County Attorney Dennis Davenport informed the commissioners of a legal issue requiring their consideration. A couple of years ago the board voted to defend election board Chairman Marilyn Watts in a suit seeking her removal from that board. She was victorious in that action, which according to Davenport means the commissioners have the option of seeking attorney fees, which in the county’s case amounted to some $58,000.

Davenport said the county could file to seek that relief from any or all of the plaintiffs in the case: the county GOP, Scott Fabricius and attorney Richard Hobbs. The board has until Feb. 15 to make such a filing in court should it decide to do so.

Location: 

Comments

If commissioners are true fiscal conservatives like they claim, then perhaps they should seek the relief.   After all its the citizens money they were required to spend to defend the election board chair. It might not stop the games people play, but it may also make people think twice next time.    
Seeking relief How many citizens will it take to seek relief from Oddo, and Barlow to recover OUR portion of the 800k +250k they p'd away and GAVE to the NAACP?
mudcat's picture
No citizens,Jessie                                                             No citizens is how many will formally get off their butts and do something. 10 or 12 is the number of citizens who will continue to second-guess their leadership decision -which was mostly good and less expensive that fighting on.                                                                                                                   At election time their 1 or 2 opponents will no doubt raise the issue mildly to embrace the old guard redneck vote, but since those guys are way in the minority, they won't focus on it endlessly. Plenty of other reasons to dump Barlow, this one vote pales in comparison to those reasons. Wonder where each lines up in the new 4/1 district scheme? If Barlow still has part of PTC, he's a goner before he has an opponent.
I would have been behind a 3/2 setup from the start.  I would also be in favor of the Chairman being elected by the citizens...ie the 1 in the scenario we are going to now.  I could see us going to that in the near future...what if any downsides to it am I missing? Not discussing the "settlement" anymore..it's done.  They have agreed...time to move and make the best of it for the County.  
Mudcat So not surrending to a Bully makes one a redneck nowadays? well then I will Proudly take off my Steston buy a plated gold fish hook and find an old ragged basebal cap to put it on and call my long lost cousin.. Ya see NO I wil NOT let it go, just like I wil not let it go when talking to people in Fulton, that THEY were promised to not have to pay that penny MARTA tax after 1982. Just like WE were told how great the Pavilion would be for the county, and Frady's Folly was needed, Ya see kitty some of us have Memories we can recall things promised, we expect people to honor their word, and we expect our government to SERVE US not rule us, However I have also seen people willing to be slaves to the government bend at it's will, and justifiy it's cowardly, often illegal actions,, I doubt Cal will allow me to use THAT label,,,BTW you got any old ball caps I might use?
mudcat's picture
Redneck by birth                                                stubborn old fool by environment. I guess there could be some exceptions where people become rednecks as they age, but there is no chance that people are born stubborn. You have to develop that stubbornness over years of broken promises, failed expectations and being overly-optimistic about the goodness in some people - especially politicians.                                                                                    I have said it before -don't set your expectations of other people too high. Better to expect mediocre performance and occasionally be pleasantly surprised when someone excels than to  unhappy all the time when people act the way people act - lazy, dishonest and mediocre.                                                           Memories are good things, but if you have a good one you can't act surprised by "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" and thousands of other things like the 3 local examples you cite. These people have no shame - look at Hillary and her answers to the e-mail flap. Locally, look at any of them and it is the same stuff.                                                                                          There are 3 causes: 1. People who have had no real power or authority get elected and they think that their IQ just went up 50 points 2. They have access to huge amounts of OPM - other people's money - more that they ever had to manage in their household or small business. When some one proposes an Art's Center a covered pool or a gateway bridge and the presentation is good and no one stands up and screams "NO!" actually no one even attends the meetings - these silly ideas are easy to approve 3. They become a group and they are all the same (see #1 and #2). Whether is only 5 of them at the local level, 50 at state or 535 in Washington, they are part of a hungry wolf pack.      When fine upstanding people like Mr. Pace say they want to change the tone, you can only just smile and nod and keep your expectations low.                                                                                      
The county should go after those three for the cost of this frivilous lawsuit,  Glad Ms. Watts won as she should have.    If people who file such suits have to pay the costs involved, maybe they will think twice before going after a good public servant who has served our county well for many years.
There is so much that the average citizen doesn't know or understand about this lawsuit that would justify declaring  it "frivilous".  Although a win was given doesn't mean it was fair or right. Chairman Oddo and his vote buddies had no legitimate right to table the nomination of Mr. Wright.  I would like to see the paragraph in the by laws that states juristiction over a political party and who they nominate. If anyone has the link, please provide url. I must have missed the time on the 11Feb, what time will this take place?
The vote for the republican election board rep should not have been tabled.  They had the letter from the party.  The other info posted at the Dias was technically not allowed because it didn't make the approved time frame for submission.  The chair should have known that, but it appears he plays games to suit his agenda.   As for the previous lawsuit, they have to seek reimbursement if they want us to believe they are true watchdogs of the citizens money.  They can't have it both ways.
H&F I believe we are seeing through Oddo (on a much smaller level) what a Trump White House will look like

Ad space area 4 internal