Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016    Login | Register        

Shots fired in Wednesday night parking lot robbery at Kedron Village retail center

Investigators with the Peachtree City Police Department are searching for suspects involved in a Feb. 3 armed robbery in the parking lot of the Chick-fil-A restaurant in the Kedron Village shopping center.

The incident occurred at approximately 8:13 p.m. on Feb. 3, with Peachtree City Police officers responding to a report of an armed robbery in the parking lot of Chick-fil-a at Kedron Village.

Officers were told than four unknown males confronted three people at gunpoint and possibly displayed knives. The suspects took an iPad, a suitcase and a briefcase containing assorted jewelry, according to incident reports.

Department spokesman Mark Brown said the suspects confronted the victims as they exited their vehicle.

One of the victims discharged a firearm at the suspects’ vehicle during the exchange. Brown subsequently added that a single shot was fired by the victim in self-defense during the robbery. No one was injured in the incident, Brown added.

Witness accounts indicate that the suspects were black males wearing dark colored masks, Brown said.

The suspects fled the scene in a silver four-door Toyota Camry, said Brown.

So far, the investigation has determined that this incident was a targeted robbery, and not a random act. It is believed that the victims were followed from a location outside of Fayette County, said Brown.

If you have information that you think would assist the Police Department in this or any other incident, please contact the police department at 770-487-8866, or to submit an anonymous tip by:

• Using the web at www.tipsubmit.com (select “Peachtree”)

• Using your cellular phone text “PTCTIPS plus your tip” to 274637 (CRIMES)”

Location: 

Comments

Watch out Peachtree City!! Fairburn is moving south just like Riverdale moved south into Fayetteville.  
I'm guessing that the victim will be spending some time at the shooting range...More justification for those that don't condone legally arming one's self...Be mindful of what's going on around you at all times!
Aurelius's picture
One comment for fear mongering and the other comment almost wishing the robbers got shot. No piece of merchandise or money is worth the risk of dying unnecessarily. But hey, its America, if you want to take the risk to stop someone from taking $200 and they shoot you before your gun gets out of your shoulder holster, then I guess that's your choice. May God rest your soul. ------> If you are interested in discussing gun control, try reading this first before I hear "More guns make us safer" mantra.   -------------------------->                      http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2813%2900444-0/fulltext                                    ---------------> American Journal of Medicine Gun Ownership and Firearm-related Deaths Conclusion:             The number of guns per capita per country was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death in a given country, whereas the predictive power of the mental illness burden was of borderline significance in a multivariable model. Regardless of exact cause and effect, however, the current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer.
Pooler's picture
Unalienable Rights, A Gift from God!  Life is precious, you protect a helpless infant, the innocent ones.    The right to life is a gift from God - Natural Rights is Natural Law endowed by God.  A Free Man does does not require "consent" from anyone to seek protection for himself or family.  One of my favorites:  "Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants."  by William Penn 
Aurelius Maybe you should tell THIS woman how guns don't make ya safe A young Oklahoma mother shot and killed an intruder to protect her 3-month-old baby on New Year's Eve, less than a week after the baby's father died of cancer. Sarah McKinley says that a week earlier a man named Justin Martin dropped by on the day of her husband's funeral, claiming that he was a neighbor who wanted to say hello. The 18-year-old Oklahoma City area woman did not let him into her home that day. On New Year's Eve Martin returned with another man, Dustin Stewart, and this time was armed with a 12-inch hunting knife. The two soon began trying to break into McKinley's home. As one of the men was going from door to door outside her home trying to gain entry, McKinley called 911 and grabbed her 12-gauge shotgun. McKinley told ABC News Oklahoma City affiliate KOCO that she quickly got her 12 gauge, went into her bedroom and got a pistol, put the bottle in the baby's mouth and called 911. "I've got two guns in my hand -- is it okay to shoot him if he comes in this door?" the young mother asked the 911 dispatcher. "I'm here by myself with my infant baby, can I please get a dispatcher out here immediately?" The 911 dispatcher confirmed with McKinley that the doors to her home were locked as she asked again if it was okay to shoot the intruder if he were to come through her door. "I can't tell you that you can do that but you do what you have to do to protect your baby," the dispatcher told her. McKinley was on the phone with 911 for a total of 21 minutes. When Martin kicked in the door and came after her with the knife, the teen mom shot and killed the 24-year-old. Police are calling the shooting justified. "You're allowed to shoot an unauthorized person that is in your home. The law provides you the remedy, and sanctions the use of deadly force," Det. Dan Huff of the Blanchard police said. Stewart soon turned himself in to police. McKinley said that she was at home alone with her newborn that night because her husband just died of cancer on Christmas Day. "I wouldn't have done it, but it was my son," McKinley told ABC News Oklahoma City affiliate KOCO. "It's not an easy decision to make, but it was either going to be him or my son. And it wasn't going to be my son. There's nothing more dangerous than a woman with a child."
MajorMike's picture
Well said JessieJames1847. When I moved to Fayette County in 1984 and Peachtree City in 1985, you could literally sleep with your doors and windows open and not have to worry. As former Sherrif Randal Johnson often said "The bad guys know where the county line is". The bad guys still know where that line is but........ in the age of commonplace drug use, revolving door Courthouses in Fulton, Clayton, and other urban Counties, they simply do not care. Fayette County is fortunate to have (way) above average Law Enforcement at both city and county levels plus being covered by the no nonsense Griffin Judicial Circuit. It would not be unreasonable to assume that Aurelius in a resident of one of the aforemention revolving door counties. It's happened before. I have been a Concealed Carry permit holder since 1967 with a few lapses over the decades. With the current political and social climate , I no longer let it lapse. Remenber, Gun Control is not about guns, it's about control. In Georgia, I recommend www.Georgiacarry.org for both information and training.  They're simply a bunch of fine folks that care about our community and State.  
Aurelius's picture
@ MajorMike - I still sleep with my doors and windows open and my car is unlocked outside the garage. No issues since I moved here in 98 to PTC, thanks for asking :)    ---------------> As I mentioned in my original post above.............I hope you do not get into a situation where the "bad guy" pulls his gun before you pull yours. I'm personally not taking the risk over $200 or even $1000 ........ my life and my families lives are way more important, than me trying to believe, we are safer, since I have a pistol. But to each his own,....if the gun makes you feel better, good for you. I also will definitely applaud you for listing a training site for gun owners. There are way too many people who do not now how to use a gun properly and it usually leads to innocent people being killed.
G35 Dude's picture
Aurelius, applaud away. You can get trainning at Autrey's Armory and probably the best one I've taken, and I've taken several, is from the Coweta County Sheriff's department. http://www.coweta.ga.us/Index.aspx?page=747 I have a permit and I carry because as a kid my Dad and Uncles business was robbed while I was there. I believe that if my uncle were not armed I wouldn't be here today. If your message is that you need to be trained to carry, I say right on. But if you want to disarm us, I'd advise you not to start here. 

You can't use logic with an illogical person.

Aurelius's picture
@G35 Dude - You mention good points and the issue is never about taking away anybody's guns. Training is very important when obtaining a gun, since there are no rules governing firearms. To obtain a gun is our unalienable right, and I totally agree. But please understand that there are many gun deaths that could have possibly been prevented by adding a few pre-registration rules. Of course not every crazy person will be caught with this process, but at least its a step in the right direction. If we can stop one or more irresponsible people, to obtain a gun, then maybe your Dad's and Uncle's store doesn't get robbed or maybe someone is still alive today. Why is that so hard to understand in Congress? Improve gun safety in society? Who is against that? Besides the NRA and their profitibility?  In my opinion, "the people" need to inform our congressmen to do something that limits the irresponsible gun use in the USA.  Its not a GOP or Democrat thing, its for all of us to resolve. Its our society and we all live in it and I personally would like to make a difference for the better and not remain at status quo. The current status quo equals alot of unnecessary and possibly preventable deaths. I hope we can at least agree on that.
Aurelius's picture
@ Jessie - One can always find a specific scenario that supports your own view. That's self justification at its best. And the biggest point, that is not listed in your story, is WHY the 2 men were visiting the home. For drugs? For money? They could have easily been trying to collect a debt from her deceased husband or maybe they were just crazies...I believe we need more details to determine the reasons behind why they were there. Of course there is no reason to break into anyone's house to begin with. ------------------> in addition, I can also list many scenarios, where people accidently shoot people everyday for no reason. If they didn't have the gun, they wouldn't be able to kill innocent people accidently. Instead of the long list, I'll remind you of the former PTC Chief who shot his wife and disabled her "by accident" since he was protecting his home from an invisible intruder, in his sleep no less. I do not want to put words in your mouth but you seem to support more guns and in doing so, means increasing the risk of accidental shootings? No thank you.  If you want to look at examples of guns everywhere............look at Somali, Syria, Iraq, Gaza, Lebanon, most of Africa......Bet you didn't even read the American Journal of Medicine report I posted above.......data speaks louder than opinions........Short summary: more civilian guns = more civilian deaths. Argue against the facts please.
Aurelius No I did NOT read the AJM aricle you posted, for one simple reason, I KNOW for a fact ANY research can me manufactured for a desired outcome (Ever hear of Global Warming? or WMD's in Iraq?) I know that if less guns made people safer 130 people in Paris would still be alive I know that since Eve took the fruit of knowledge; evil people have existed on this planet, people that regardless of Law, Moral Beliefs, or just plain ole human decency will and do seek any means necessary to harm others. I know this, do you know in the State of Ga NOT ONE not a SINGLE Concealed Weapons holder has been convicted of Gun Murder since 1948 and even then that was the Sheriff over in Coweta I know this, The Passenger load of a Boeing 747 dies EVERYDAY in this country (yes that's a Boeing 747 Crashing EVERYDAY) 350* people from PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE,, yet some how my Guns whom have NEVER injured a Human Being are a problem  *CDC 2013 I know this, without the Second Amendment the 13th NEVER stands I know this, you Aurelius have demonstrated a polite disagreement to this topic, and as a gun nut that WILL oppose your opinions appreciate the Politeness, Hope I come across on this issue as the same  
Aurelius's picture
@Jessie - You make a good point on data, but I try to only use data that is hopefully unbiased and not from a major media network. Typically I look for raw data and charts. I do not want to read someone's summary of the data, this is why I post the data and not media links.---------------------------> I will have to say Climate Change is real - just look outside your window - you can place the blame where you want to,  the change is real. ------------------->WMD's was always a farce and they all sold the story to us so the Defense Contractors could hit their bonuses for  years to come. No argument there at all. ----------------> I do not think you can claim that more guns in Paris would have stopped the terrorists. Maybe it would have been a different crime scene in the end, but the terrorists had a specific goal and in my opinion, no guns or anything else was going to stop them from pulling the trigger on innocent people. -------------------> Very interesting fact on concealed firearm holders in GA. And I can appreciate people who are properly trained to use a gun and conceal it - that is not the problem, in my opinion. If we do a better job to vet the people buying the guns maybe one less person is gunned down for no reason. This is the point, that I cannot understand why we don't agree and enact at least some basic control. No one wants to take away guns...thats absurd and it is our unalienable right. But WHO gets the gun, should be monitored and controlled. ---------------->Prescription Drug abuse is definitely a problem but we can discuss this at a later time. ---------> I am glad we can agree to disagree, that is politics and America. But I still would like to see at least a small step towards responsbile gun ownership and not a free for all, as it is now. Have a great evening.
Aurelius Gun Control Here's THE problem with ANY "Gun Control" legislation, GUNS are NOT the problem any more so than is Whiskey to blame for a drunk killing someone on the road. Case in pont, google how many WELL CONTROLLED firearms are stolen from POLICE each and every year, is that the guns fault? If we as a people REALLY want to talk about "gun control" the Trigger word (pardon the pun) MUST address the problem which is CRIME CONTROL , We made Hate Crime laws, let's make GUN CRIME laws, if Crime (physical assault) is committed with a firearm that adds an INSTANT 25 years to the sentence with legislation written into the law that 25 years MEANS 25 years not 2. (Want to bet the knife crime rate skyrockets?) As proven time and time again Back Ground Checks have not stopped ONE SINGLE animal from mass killing people Adam Lanza FAILED a background check yet proceeded to murder 20 children. The whole plain simple truth is Laws like locks are written to keep an honest person honest Laws DO NOT PREVENT CRIME they are used as a mechanism to Punish Crime, Police CAN NOT (Government) protect us 24/7 that is OUR responsibility and when government removes MY (our) ability to do so (Gun Free Zones aka Target Rich Environments) government is FAILING in it's most basic reason to exist Good Evening to you as well
Aurelius's picture
@ Jessie - Very interesting information on the lack of discipline of police forces to keep controlled guns locked away. Seems like a lack of discipline in those police departments.  I like your idea on the increased punishment for Gun Crimes for sure.  One of the best solutions to any issue is a strong deterrent.  I'm sure criminals will also find the loop hole as you have pointed out (knives will be popular). ---------> You take an interesting position on why we shouldn't do anything about gun control and background checks. I will mention first, that one of the main reasons we do not have the data on how many background checks stopped a killing, is the simple fact that Congress defunded the CDC program that was tracking this data (thanks NRA lobbying!). Without CDC funding, we cannot discuss the data, so there is nothing to discuss other than our opinions on the background check being meaningful. ----------------> Although I can appreciate  your viewpoint on "laws are for honest people" logic(since this does appear to be the case in most instances) we should at least pass some laws so we can enforce the punishments. Right now there isn't one law regarding guns and it is the only product that does not have any regulation, and did I mention its the most dangerous product that is not regulated? At least agree that we should mandate training through validated training facilities.     "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" - Benjamin Franklin.
Major Mike to further your point (this may be from 2011 but it's quite prophetic) SPARTANBURG COUNTY, S.C. —The Spartanburg County Sheriff is known for speaking his mind, and at a news conference on Monday, he didn't hold back his anger and frustration after a woman was attacked in a park over the weekend. Investigators said 46-year-old Walter Lance grabbed a woman who was walking her dog in Milliken Park on Sunday afternoon. They said Lance choked the woman, made her take off her clothing and tried to rape her. (Full Story) Lance is in custody and was denied bond on Monday. Unedited: Sheriff Wright?s News Conference Sheriff Chuck Wright opened his news conference by saying, "Our form of justice is not making it." He said, "Carry a concealed weapon. That'll fix it." Wright said Lance had been charged numerous times with crimes against women, and other crimes such as resisting arrest and escape. Wright said Lance had been on probation for a federal gun charge. He referred to Lance repeatedly as an "animal," and expressed his disgust about Lance's long record and the attack. Wright said Lance has had more than 20 charges dating back to 1983. Wright said Lance has been in jail more often than he has, and he runs the jail, and he said Lance gets out easier. Wright punctuated it by saying, "And I'm aggravated." He said he doesn't believe every person needs to be kept in jail, but he said, "I don't think this animal deserves to be out in our society, walking alongside our women." Wright said,"Liberals call me and tell me the chain-gang form of justice isn't working. Well, let me inform you, your form of justice isn't working either." He said Lance should not have had the right or opportunity to "violate a good, upstanding woman." "This is a horrific crime," Wright said. "Her life was threatened so many times." He said Lance "doesn't fight police or men folk -- he just goes after women." He said Lance is not married because, "No woman can stay married to him because he beats them down too much." Wright said, "It's too bad someone with a concealed weapons permit didn't walk by. That would fix it." He said people are tired of doing the right thing and criminals getting away with their actions. He said several times, "I want you to get a concealed weapons permit." At one point, Wright held up a fanny pack and said, "They make this right here where you can conceal a small pistol in them. They got one called The Judge that shoots a .45 or a .410 shell. You ain't got to be accurate; you just have to get close." Wright said, "I'm tired of looking at victims saying, 'There's life after this' ? I'm tired of saying, 'We're sorry, we can't keep them in jail.'" Wright said in his view, gun control is, "Is when you can get your barrel back on the target quick. That?s gun control." Wright said the attack is not the fault of Millken Park. He said, "It's a nice place for families." He said officers patrol the area all the time and respond to various calls there. He said, "Don't blame anyone for having an animal on their property ? We can't get it all." He encouraged women to walk in groups, and he ended by saying again, "I want you to get a concealed weapons permit. Don't get Mace. Get a firearm." And then he said, "I think I better stop before I get sanctioned." WYFF Channel 4 no author listed Oct 31 2011
Aurelius's picture
@ Jessie - almost missed this post.  Try this website out for gun deaths versus motor vehicle deaths. -------------->    http://www.vpc.org/press/gun-deaths-surpass-motor-vehicle-deaths-in-21-states-and-the-district-of-columbia/                                                      When more people die from a gun than from a car, then it becomes public enemy #1.                                                                                                        The data is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Gun deaths include gun suicides, homicides, and fatal unintentional shootings; motor vehicle deaths include both occupants and pedestrians. ---------------------------->Firearms are the only consumer product the federal government does not regulate for health and safety, science-based regulations have dramatically reduced deaths from motor vehicles in recent decades. It’s well past time that we regulate firearms for health and safety just like all other consumer products. -----------------------------> Nine out of ten American households have access to a motor vehicle while fewer than a third of American households have a gun. Yet nationwide in 2014, there were 33,599 gun deaths compared to 35,647 motor vehicle deaths.  --------------> Guns are the problem period. More guns = more deaths. We need to come up with a viable solution that protects the children of the future.
Veritas's picture
You do realize that more than half of gun deaths in the US are a result of suicide? As such suicide by firearms are included in the studies numbers as well as criminal on criminal...ie.. gang on gang violence. 
Aurelius's picture
@ Veritas - Thank you adding detail to the conversation. I agree with you and I'm glad you brought this up. In my opinion, suicides can mostly be attributed to tragic personal situations and the lack of adapting to that situation. If you agree, I would tend to say that most of the suicidal people, probably need mental health assistance. This leads to why we do not have gun control laws to evaluate people who may have a mental health problem/issue.  Why would anyone be against a law that prevents mentally ill people to have a gun? If someone is clinically diagnosed as mentally ill, you don't get a gun. How can anyone attack that statement?  (I'm sure someone can find a baseless way if they tried hard)
brewster's picture
Mental health stigma already prevents many from seeking help to lead a "normal" life. Not talking about obvious "psyho's" here, but to be faced with never able to own a fire-arm may further prevent people from seeking treatement our at least counseling for potential mental heath issues that may be real or imagined. There would need to be levels of diagnosis to qualify for gun laws.
Aurelius's picture
@ Brewster - Good point, no one would want to be stigmatized by being officially labeled mentally ill, for many reasons, including possibly owning a gun. But I like your proposal regarding different levels of diagnosis. That is definitely a good starting point for some movement forward on controlling irresponsible gun owners. I'll add mandatory training through accredited facilities as well. Good post.
I have seen it reported elsewhere that the victims were followed down 74 from a location outside of Fayette, not a random attack.  This is on the Peachtree City Police Facebook page. Is there more to this story?  Still nothng on this angle.  I see it being important myself.   
Aurelius's picture
@Spyglass - You are spot on. It would be interesting to find out where they came from previously and if the parties "knew" each other. There appears to be alot of the background missing to evaluate this event accurately.  Did the one carload of people, instigate the other party? Did they come from a bar? A home nearby? Was this a domestic dispute that was dragged to the Chik Fil A?   Drug deal gone bad?  Too many scenarios to list really without more information.
I find the silence of the reporting regarding this strange, to say the least.  Sometimes I think the goal is to get citizens worked up over things like this.. We shall see where it goes.  
Aurelius, you should be lecturing the criminals, not the victims.  If the criminals think that $200 is worth losing your life over, that's one thing, but if a victim, who's not sure the bad guy is going to stop at just taking the money, but may take their life, then they SHOULD defend themselves with deadly force.  EVERY TIME !  Your statistics of 33K deaths due to firearms is so skewed and incorrect, it's not worth the time to correct.
Aurelius's picture
@ 30yearresident - I didn't think I was lecturing, only pointing out the one sided viewpoints of whipping up fear and practically endorsing a death of a fellow human being. I agree with you on the use of force in deadly situations, but in everyday disagreements this would be ridiculus and akin to the Wild Wild West. ------------------>  You may want to possibly risk your life over $200 but I won't. -------------> I am so sorry you do not believe that there are more gun deaths than motor vehicle deaths. Data is data - you can believe whoever  you are getting your information from. I know that it doesn't matter to me if its 1000 people or 33k people..... any American that dies from an irresponsible gun owner is too much . The irresponsible gun owner needs to punished severely.
It's NOT about $200.00 When your property is stolen it's NOT the dollar amount that is being taken (even if it's cold hard cash) People exchange a portion of thier FINITE time for "x" amount of dollars so they can then exchange those dollars for goods or services they want ,, A thief is literally STEALING a portion of a person LIFE, a portion of LIFE that can never be replaced, maybe a man spent time away from his family in exchange for dollars to buy that car, Time that man will NEVER get to spend with his family,,that time is gone, and THIS is what a thief is stealing and on those grounds I have NO problem treating a thief just as any of us would treat a Murderer
MajorMike's picture
Exactly JessieJames1847!
Aurelius's picture
@Jessie - I'm surprised that you will put your life on the line for any amount of money/merchandise. You may not have any more time left, if you aren't the quickest gun in Fayette county, in any given situation. What is hard to understand, is how anyone would risk the rest of their life for $200 or $1000 or whatever. Are you saying that your view on the value of life is that small?  In my opinion, all of our lives are important and we should limit the risk of shortening our lives, which includes irresponsible people with guns. I'm confident Jesus would not endorse killing people, or maybe I read the wrong Bible. Please don't be a hypocrit. If you want to kill everyone for anything, then please do not profess to follow Jesus' teachings. I'm pretty sure that's a commandment......right?
Limit ,,,Aurelius "all of our lives are important and we should limit the risk of shortening our lives, which includes irresponsible people with guns." It is the IRresponsible people with guns (democrats) that would seek to shorten my life, whether I am the quickest draw in Fayette County or not, it is the IRresponsible people (Hillary Voters) that pose a threat to MY life (life as describe in the above post) , what is IRRESPONSIBLE on MY part is to be ignorant, blind or a deiner of FACTS and burry my head in the sand and HOPE one of Sheriff Babb's employees is witth-in small arms distannce when a disgruntialed democrat that failed a Federal Back Ground Check opens fire with a musket or AK47 What is IRRESPONSIBLE on MY part is to be unprepared, and become a burden to YOU or members of your family, What is IRRESPONSIBLE is for me to trust OTHERS to secure ME and MINE at the expense of others. What is IRRESPONSIBLE is for ME to ask YOU (or others) to work on my behalf and provide for me that which I am unwilling to seek for myself. What is IRRESPONSIBLE is if I bring new life into this world with no hope of providing FOR that life "I" made. What is NOT irresponibilie is for ME to respect my neighbors life liberty and property and at the same time be willing to defend MY single dollar ,,as THAT single dollar cost ME a portion of MY life I will NEVER get back    
Your cut and paste skills are awesome..either that or you need a vacation. 
Spyglass Sometimes I can be more dense than Lead,, I'm afraid this is one of those times, I don't understand what you were are telling me

Ad space area 4 internal