That's Racist!

26 replies [Last post]
Joe Kawfi
Joe Kawfi's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/20/2009

Ware said the jury shouldn’t have heard secondhand testimony that Commissioner Emma Darnell played a role, allegedly telling a deputy county manager that she had “too many white boys” in Human Services and the new director should be black and female.

Also during the trial, former County Manager Tom Andrews admitted calling employees “black marbles” and “white marbles” in weighing personnel decisions.

Jury: Fulton discriminated againt white, male job applicant

Joe Kawfi
Joe Kawfi's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/20/2009
'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'

This should be interesting. The only guy that the liberals could find to give the key note speech was a sexual deviant and womanizer that was impeached for perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power. Based on the comment below, he's also apparently a racist. (As most democrats are)

Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'

Joe Kawfi
Joe Kawfi's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/20/2009
That's Racist!

OBAMA: Black, Hispanic kids are 'our future workforce'

The president responded by saying he would focus on "communities of color" in his second term because those two groups are the "future workforce" of America.

S. Lindsey
S. Lindsey's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2008
Nah not racist...

...does show, however, he is NOT the President of the United States just certain parts of it...

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Only in Obama's America

Illegal immigrant seeks to scrap Georgia driver license law

http://www.ajc.com/news/news/illegal-immigrant-seeks-to-scrap-georgia-dr...

The following comment to that story said it best:

Discriminates against illegal immigrants? AWESOME. IT SHOULD

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
Cy & "Only in Obama's America"

Wonder how this dude has survived 10 yrs here as an illegal? And now they know for sure he is one, I say deport his sorry ass and he can get his driver's license back in his own country!

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Gym... As soon as he shows up..

in court he should be deported. But noooooo, that would be insensitive and not fair. What silliness.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
Illegal for 10 years?

I bet he was employed by someone who found it cheaper to hire him than an American! Can't blame that on Obama. He's deported more illegals than any previous president - and yet treats those whose parents broke the law with some sense of justice. If my daddy broke the law, I wouldn't be sent to jail.

Joe Kawfi
Joe Kawfi's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/20/2009
Illegals

Obama has no respect for hard working Americans or the rule of law. He bypasses congress as any dictator would.
This illegal probably took a job from another American. Obama doesn't care about that. He only cares about pandering to illegals and using out tax dollars to buy votes from his union and green energy cronies.

Quallacherokee
Quallacherokee's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/27/2011
UMM Drivers license,,,

In 1956 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled,,,
Individuals have the right to "self conveyance by ordinary means"
Taylor v Indiana ,, This SCOTUS ruling which has NOT been over-turned
makes Driver License UNCONSTITUTIONAL ,,, however, the further decision
was that IF "conveyance" was on Federally funded byways, a FEE was constitutional...

Bottom line is
State required Drivers License ARE Unconstitutional
Toll Roads are not

THE REAL Bottom line is the US CONSTITUTION has NO legal Standing in the US

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Quallacherokee

Do you have the docket number?

JeffC
JeffC's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/21/2006
Correct QC

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to . . . operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." Teche Lines v Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784; Thompson v. Smith, supra.

However, I have not been able to find the SCOTUS ruling in Taylor v Indiana you cited. Can you please provide a link?

Quallacherokee
Quallacherokee's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/27/2011
taylor V indiana

Was saved in my old puter,,, Am looking... I WILL supply the info

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Quallacherokee

I thought I was the only one that had that problem.

Anyways, getting back the illegal and his case, I don't believe that his attorney is arguing or citing those cases as a defense.

JeffC
JeffC's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/21/2006
Not applicable Cyclist

All of the rulings unanimously (I think, check before accepting as 100% accurate)explicitly cite this as a right of citizens.

On another note, you're lucky you don't come back and find that there are 23 Windows Updates and the Control Panel/System and Security/Action Center is sending you messages to update the system except if you do, update number 5 interferes with update number 12 and update number 7 patches the same place that update number 15 did but for a different reason and when Windows reboots it says THAT THE UPDATES CAN'T BE IMPLEMENTED AND WINDOWS IS ROLLING BACK THE UPDATES AND REBOOTING. And when it reboots, it says, WINDOWS HAS IMPORTANT UPDATES. CLICK HERE TO INSTALL UPDATES.

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
JeffC

I solved all my computer problems with four letters.........IMAC. I was glad to get rid of the old troublesome box.

Quallacherokee
Quallacherokee's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/27/2011
Solving Computer Issues

There is a VERY simple solution to this modern problem,
it requires neither IT professionals, nor a 20 year degree,
All that is required is a visit to a local Pawn Shop and $50.00

1) 20 ga single shot loaded with # 6 shot,, aim, pull the trigger
Computer Problem Solved

Quallacherokee
Quallacherokee's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/27/2011
For while a Citizen has the

For while a Citizen has the Right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that Right does not extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in part, as a place for private gain. For the latter purpose no person has a vested right to use the highways of the state, but is a privilege or a license which the legislature may grant or withhold at its discretion." State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Hadfield, supra; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; and other cases too numerous to mention.

"The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579.

"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived." [emphasis added] Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.16

Complete freedom of the highways is so old and well established a blessing that we have forgotten the days of the Robber Barons and toll roads, and yet, under an act like this, arbitrarily administered, the highways may be completely monopolized, if, through lack of interest, the people submit, then they may look to see the most sacred of their liberties taken from them one by one, by more or less rapid encroachment." Robertson vs. Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133, 147.

So what is a privilege to use the roads? By now it should be apparent even to the "learned" that an attempt to use the road as a place of business is a privilege. The distinction must be drawn between...

1. Travelling upon and transporting one's property upon the public roads, which is our Right; and...

2. Using the public roads as a place of business or a main instrumentality of business, which is a privilege.

"[The roads]...are constructed and maintained at public expense, and no person therefore, can insist that he has, or may acquire, a vested right to their use in carrying on a commercial business." Ex Parte Sterling, 53 SW.2d 294; Thomas v Indiana, 17 P.2d 82; Stephenson vs. Binford, supra.

"When the public highways are made the place of business the state has a right to regulate their use in the interest of safety and convenience of the public as well as the preservation of the highways." Barney vs. Railroad Commissioners, supra.

"[The state's] right to regulate such use is based upon the nature of the business and the use of the highways in connection therewith." Ibid.

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Quallacherokee

Yup, I've seen all of those web sites too.

I think the same thing can be said of waterways were licensing for pleasure travel is not required.

Now with that said, since airways are essential a public domain, why do I need to be certificated - Part 61 - by the Friendly Aviation Association? Good discussion.

Quallacherokee
Quallacherokee's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/27/2011
Part 61

It COULD be argued that "controlled" flight is commercial use only,,,, and "uncontrolled flight" is a hazard to others,,,,

MY argument would be Flight "restricted" to ONLY above public roads is no different than driving, but the nano-Second the flight is above "private" property undue hazard IS perpetrated against the land owner,,,

IMC Flight seems reasonably "clear" as to why standards to ensure a reasonable expiation of safe operation would be required,
FAR 105 seems to imo follow this "idea" of Freedom of Travel...
(although I'd like to see an increase of 105 Aircraft to include ones below 1 ton MTOW, or 200 hp)

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Honestly, the whole 103 exercise...

and LSA is a joke IMO. I think the arbitrary setting of HP and weight limits is meaningless.

I guess it's in the spirit of harmonization with other NAA's.

Quallacherokee
Quallacherokee's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/27/2011
103

I do that all the time, switch 103 with 105

will say 105.7 is the reg that would keep me from jumping, cuz THAT'S the ONLY way I'm leaving a perfectly operational aircraft

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Quallacherokee

That's OK. I sometimes have to tell ASI's that they cited the wrong reg.

PTC Observer
PTC Observer's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2007
So Jeff,

the state requirement to have a drivers licence is unconstitutional, but showing an ID in order to vote is not.

It would seem to me that the Tenth Amendment covers both cases as they are not enumerated in the Constitution. Therefore, the SCOTUS has no Constitutional authority to rule on these requirements as it is reserved to the states to decide.

JeffC
JeffC's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/21/2006
It seems so PTCO

I support voter ID, universal registration, standardized voting procedures and a dispute process independent of the political parties. It is patently preposterous that voters are not required to show an ID.

PTC Observer
PTC Observer's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2007
Well Jeff

we do agree on something after all. ;)

Joe Kawfi
Joe Kawfi's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/20/2009
That's Racist!

Bill Maher, Chief Contributor to the Obama Campaign: "If you're thinking about voting for Mitt Romney, I would like to make this one plea: black people know who you are and they will come after you"

Bill Maher Warns Romney Supporters: 'Black People Know Who You Are and They Will Come After You'

So what are you saying here, Billy Boy? That Black people are a bunch of thugs and criminals? That's racist!

Recent Comments