Obama’s dream turns into our Nightmare
Last week President Obama violated his Oath of Office specifically his pledge to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution Clause 4 of the Constitution empowers Congress to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”. The key part of this is the establishment of LAW. What is a LEGAL Immigrant and what is not.
The Law is very clear. If you enter the United States by any other means other than the established LEGAL methods then by definition you are therefore a criminal. You broke the Law.
When you break the Law in the United States there is supposed to be a penalty not a benefit. The President’s act of signing an Executive order allowing ILLEGAL Aliens to enter the US, take jobs, educational positions and then send the profits from their Criminal endeavor back to their home Country, effectively not only negates any penalties it incentifies the Criminal act itself.
Just last year the President said this:
“With respect to the notion that I could suspend deportations through executive order, that's just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed and I know that everybody here at Bell is studying hard so you know we have three branches of government. Congresses passes the law. The executive branch's job is to enforce and implement those laws and then the judiciary has to interpret the law. There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system, that for me through simply an executive order ignore those mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as president.”
Yet this is exactly what he just did. The President does not tell Congress what to do. He can promote an agenda and then threaten to veto anything contradictory to that agenda, however the Constitution is also very clear on the separate but equal powers of the Branches of Government.
This President believes, he actually believes, the Constitution does not apply to him. He has created one Constitutional crisis after the other.
One must remember what the President said. In his own words:
”To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf”.
So in his opinion since the Constitution just doesn’t go far enough to tell him how much control Government can have he has decided to extend that opinion to mean anything that they feel they should do.
Remember Congressman Pete Stark? “The Federal Government can do most anything it wants in this Country”.
This does seem to be the mantra of the new Dictatorship of Obama.