Proven: Government intervention prolonged the Great Depression

Thomas Sowell's picture

Sometimes you can read a book that will change your mind on some fundamental issue. Rarely, however, is there just one page that can undermine or destroy a widely-held belief. But there is such a page — page 77 of the book “Out of Work” by Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway.

The widespread belief is that government intervention is the key to getting the country out of a serious economic downturn. The example often cited is President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s intervention, after the stock market crash of 1929 was followed by the Great Depression of the 1930s, with its massive and long-lasting unemployment.

This is more than just a question about history. Right here and right now there is a widespread belief that the unregulated market is what got us into our present economic predicament, and that the government must “do something” to get the economy moving again. FDR’s intervention in the 1930s has often been cited by those who think this way.

What is on that one page in “Out of Work” that could change people’s minds? Just a simple table, giving unemployment rates for every month during the entire decade of the 1930s.

Those who think that the stock market crash in October 1929 is what caused the huge unemployment rates of the 1930s will have a hard time reconciling that belief with the data in that table.

Although the big stock market crash occurred in October 1929, unemployment never reached double digits in any of the next 12 months after that crash. Unemployment peaked at 9 percent, two months after the stock market crashed — and then began drifting generally downward over the next six months, falling to 6.3 percent by June 1930.

This was what happened in the market, before the federal government decided to “do something.”

What the government decided to do in June 1930 — against the advice of literally a thousand economists, who took out newspaper ads warning against it — was impose higher tariffs, in order to save American jobs by reducing imported goods.

This was the first massive federal intervention to rescue the economy, under [Republican] President Herbert Hoover, who took pride in being the first President of the United States to intervene to try to get the economy out of an economic downturn.

Within six months after this government intervention, unemployment shot up into double digits — and stayed in double digits in every month throughout the entire remainder of the decade of the 1930s, as the [Democratic] Roosevelt administration expanded federal intervention far beyond what Hoover had started.

If more government regulation of business is the magic answer that so many seem to think it is, the whole history of the 1930s would have been different. An economic study in 2004 concluded that New Deal policies prolonged the Great Depression. But the same story can be found on one page in “Out of Work.”

While the market produced a peak unemployment rate of 9 percent — briefly — after the stock market crash of 1929, unemployment shot up after massive federal interventions in the economy. It rose above 20 percent in 1932 and stayed above 20 percent for 23 consecutive months, beginning in the Hoover administration and continuing during the Roosevelt administration.

As Casey Stengel used to say, “You could look it up.” It is all there on that one page.

Those who are convinced that the government has to “do something” when the economy has a problem almost never bother to find out what actually happens when the government intervenes.

The very fact that we still remember the stock market crash of 1929 is remarkable, since there was a similar stock market crash in 1987 that most people have long since forgotten.

What was the difference between these two stock market crashes? The 1929 stock market crash was followed by the most catastrophic depression in American history, with as many as one-fourth of all American workers being unemployed. The 1987 stock market crash was followed by two decades of economic growth with low unemployment.

But that was only one difference. The other big difference was that the Reagan administration did not intervene in the economy after the 1987 stock market crash — despite many outcries in the media that the government should “do something.”

[Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com.] COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

JeffC
JeffC's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/21/2006
Thomas Sowell

Comparing the 1929 stock market crash to the 1987 crash is ridiculous. In 1929 the market peaked at 381.17 and began a decline down to 41.22, an 89% decline.

In 1989 the market lost 22.68% from its peak but was positive for the year. On January 2, 1987 the DOW was at 1897 and on December 31st it was at 1939.

Sowell's just a dishonest Republican hack masquerading as an economist and depending on the ignorance of the masses.

carbonunit52
carbonunit52's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/05/2008
undependable carbonunit

Well, Mr. Sowell can not depend on the sure enough ignoramus carbonunit for support.

PTC Observer
PTC Observer's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2007
Mr. Sowell's works

I have read many of Professor Sowell's books, in my opinion he is one of the greatest minds of our generation. I highly recommend you too read some of his works.

disoja
disoja's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/16/2010
Dow Futures

Dow Futures timing is very important for taking decisions. All the sale and purchase decisions have to taken quickly and correctly by the dealers in a live stock market otherwise; they might sustain serious financial loss.

Courthouserules
Courthouserules's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/02/2010
disoja?

You could be correctly wrong! Taking decisions is easier than making them!
The dealers in the live stock market, especially sheep and cattle, know to fatten and water.
DOW futures timing will cause the cattle to need dehorning and the sheep sheared.

Recent Comments