Who’s buying the healthcare snake oil?

Terry Garlock's picture

You had to be on a wilderness trek the last couple of weeks to miss the Catholic Church backlash against a new mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. Predictably, most in the media fed on the surface morsels, leaving you to dig deeper on your own to find the truly important points.

Let me get right to it. Wake up! Even if you are not Catholic, your freedom is being taken from you.

Here’s the short version. The Secretary of Health and Human Services made just one ACA decision, with many more lined up to come, mandating that Catholic hospitals and other church-owned entities be required to provide health insurance to employees that must include services contrary to church doctrine, like contraception, sterilization and abortion.

The kickback was considerable. In response, President Obama announced an “accommodation,” saying these church-related organizations would not be required to directly pay for these services, but that their insurers will be required to deliver those specific services free of charge.

Too many Americans these days can’t think past their own personal benefit, but if you think through what happened here you might be worried; you should be worried.

First, I am no defender of the Catholic Church’s doctrine, but I am disturbed by the arrogance of government intrusion into any church’s business.

Second, only government could come up with this solution that is a distinction without a difference. The “accommodation” provides the merest fig leaf of pretended adherence to church doctrine while actually circumventing church doctrine.

Third, the President decided to “allow” the church to do things in a slightly different way to “accommodate” the ACA law. The President decided what the church would be allowed to do. Why, thank you, Mr. President.

Think back please to the founding of our country, and what made America so unique that spread hope for freedom throughout the world. Heretofore, rulers had decided what rights the people would have, if any.

America, however, was founded by and for the people, and the people gave limited powers to the federal government, retaining the rest for the states and themselves.

Freedom of religion was a pivotal part of our beginnings. Our government’s reach does not extend into the church, but apparently someone forgot to tell President Obama.

If the Catholic Church had made their own free choice of this same “accommodation” to resolve this church-state dispute, I would not be bothered. But the Church’s power to decide was usurped by the President.

Whether you like or dislike the President’s “accommodation,” did you notice it directs private insurance companies to provide a specific service at a specific price of zero?

This is another unprecedented government intrusion, this time into the private sector, and of course nothing is free. Your health insurance premiums will go up to pay for it.

These are the things that should bother you.

This HHS decision was just one of many to come. Do you recall that ACA law establishes 159 boards and commissions, many not even yet established, that will themselves create new regulations to determine limits on your healthcare choices?

That should alarm every citizen, especially since human nature prompts officials to create ever-more rules and regulations that inevitably trample common sense.

Here is one example of what is coming, from a recent Wall Street Journal piece by Dr. Scott Gottlieb. He describes the committee called the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (PSTF) that for the past 25 years has been an advisory board to physicians. The PSTF gives a rating from A to D to screening tests or preventive treatment, or an I if they consider the evidence too insufficient to be determinant. Sounds fine so far.

The PSTF is a board of part-time volunteers, making decisions very slowly, using long studies like the FDA, and as a result they are far behind conventional medical practices.

For example, doctors had been recommending to patients a daily aspirin as a heart attack and stroke preventive measure for decades before the PSTF recommendation.

This is the same body that in 2009 concluded women age 40-49 should not have routine mammograms. Since this committee is so often out of step and far behind, many physicians simply ignore PSTF recommendations.

But your doctor will no longer be able to ignore them since the ACA grants PSTF much control over the procedures doctors order for you. Soon, health insurers will be REQUIRED to cover preventive measures rated A and B by PSTF, such as colon cancer screening, without any co-payment.

Other screening likely to be required include hepatitis C, osteoporosis in men, depression in children, counseling for obesity in adults and for alcohol use in adolescents.

If all this sounds good to you, take a deep breath and ask yourself, “At what cost?” Every mandated service will have a corresponding upward push on insurance premiums.

As premiums increase, there is every reason to believe that insurers will try to contain runaway costs by disallowing coverage for preventive measures rated C and D, like screening for testicular or ovarian cancer, to cite just two of many examples.

For patients who cannot pay for it themselves, those procedures would be unavailable. Every new required procedure, even though they may be irrelevant to you, means some other procedures, even if they are vital to you, must be deleted from the coverage list to keep premiums from rising out of sight.

What influence do you have over this PSTF committee? None. They are not required to hold public meetings, they don’t have to disclose draft decisions before they become new regulations and there is no direct appeal process.

Hold on tight — many more board, committees and HHS decisions affecting your healthcare are on the way, courtesy of the ACA law.

This is all part of the fantasy of free healthcare.

In the recent media frenzy over the Catholic Church mandate, TV talking heads lectured one another about women’s “right” to free contraception, sterilization and abortion. I suppose in today’s world of feelings replacing thought, if you want something bad enough it becomes a “right” in some small minds.

I didn’t hear of a single obstacle preventing any woman from obtaining these services by paying for them herself.

The theory of insurance is spreading the risk of catastrophic loss among a large number of people, each paying a small amount because their individual risk of loss is small, like your homeowner’s insurance or life insurance.

But the socialists among us have conditioned a generation to expect our healthcare services will be paid for by someone else, even for something foreseeable and routine, like birth control pills.

Even though ACA is just beginning to take form, some businesses are already reporting healthcare premium increases of 25 percent or more. That is because new gifts from ACA we all love — like no pre-existing conditions and keeping your kid on your health insurance until they are 25 — are new mandates that have a cost.

Mandates are not free, not even when the President claims they are free.

ACA complexity has injected vast uncertainty into the healthcare insurance market, and insurers are covering themselves with premium hikes with more to come. A recent Gallup poll says 85 percent of small business, which creates 70 percent of America’s new jobs, has no plans to hire any workers, half because of health insurance uncertainty, and half due to growing regulation.

Businesses large and small are shifting work to part-time employees so they will not be required to provide health insurance to them.

All this from the first taste of Obamacare with loads more to come. And it all derives from the idealism of making healthcare “free” soup to nuts, cradle to grave, for everyone.

Maybe you are content with the belief the government will take care of you. You should be anxious that new gaggles of boards and commissions will soon start deciding which procedures your doctor may perform, and which ones will not be paid for by your insurance policy. They may even decide which ones you may not purchase with your own money.

The way to boil a live frog is to put him in a pan of cool water and turn up the heat slowly, and by the time he realizes he is in trouble, it is too late for the frog.

Wake up! You are being boiled.

[Terry Garlock lives in Peachtree City and writes columns occasionally for The Citizen. He has authored a book, “Strength & Honor: America’s Best in Vietnam.” His email is terry@garlock1.com.]

Ninja Guy
Ninja Guy's picture
Joined: 06/26/2010
Somebody Answer Me This!

This is a good thing for government to do:

Tell you to go off to another country and shoot people and blow them up, with some unintended consequences, such as 'collateral damage' ie, the deaths of innocent men, women and children and general destruction of a society.

This is a bad thing for government to do:

Tell you to buy some health insurance so others won't have to foot the bill if you get sick.

Somebody please splain to me how this is even remotely coherent thinking!

Anybody got buddy passes to Copenhagen for T-Gar?

Ninja Guy
Ninja Guy's picture
Joined: 06/26/2010
Terry, Thank You As Always

for fighting the Vietnamese so PTC could give tax breaks to a company owned and operated by the next big member of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party--We really showed them whose boss over there didn't we? BTW, did you get water-boarded during SEAR school?

Also, have you ever lived under socialized medicine? I have in a few different countries. It works pretty good. The care is about as good as you get here at Piedmont. You should really experience it first hand before you go all PTSD on it! Boom!

I suggest Denmark. I never lived there, but I hear it always scores at or near the top on the happy index--state-run healthcare being part of the reason! But, then again, it seems being happy might not be high on your list of priorities!

If you don't want to live there, here is an article by someone who actually has!


Don't you find it a bit ironic that COBRA is a government acronym having a bit to do with healthcare? Maybe its a sign from God!

Eat collards much?

tgarlock's picture
Joined: 10/26/2005
Ninja, I do wonder . . .

. . . what psychedelic color the sky must be on your planet.

Ninja Guy
Ninja Guy's picture
Joined: 06/26/2010
T-Gar, PTC Might Be A

bubble, but as far as I know it hasn't been declared a separate planet! Perhaps you are suffering COBRA flashbacks! I never participated in any of that psychedelic stuff, so you'll have to enlighten me there!

Still doesn't change the fact that state-run medicine in industrialized nations works pretty good!

You into Flo Rida these days?

kcchiefandy's picture
Joined: 09/18/2009
Good point, Ninja!

A country of 5.5 million compared to ours w/ over 300 million; we have twice that many ILLEGALS! I'm sure it'd work just the same here. Being mostly Lutheran I guess they wouldn't have a contraception issue. Oh, they have a king & queen, too. Should we crown Obama then, too (well, at least those of us that haven't yet!)? Apples & oranges, IMHO...

BTW, is 'SEAR' school the same as SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, & Escape) school?

Ninja Guy
Ninja Guy's picture
Joined: 06/26/2010
My Bad Andy!

I thought it was Search Evade And Rescue. I stand humbly corrected! I do need you and Wedgie around to keep me in line! A sliver throwing star to you for the correction!

Well, in Denmark, you have to show proper papers to get treatment, so I think that would go over good here! Germany has a considerably larger population than Denmark and the people there seem to like the system, and you know how demanding the Germies can be!

We might consider crowning Obama the King of Pop, as he has been showing off his singing chops recently! No match for Flo Rida though!

How do you like the recent changes to the English mass? I'm still leaning toward adopting Catho as my Western religion to complement my current Taoist philosophy despite the recent dust up and the pedophile thing!

Perhaps you can give me and Pastor Epps some weekly tips on how to be Catholic! I'm sure he would appreciate that!

kcchiefandy's picture
Joined: 09/18/2009
Well, Ninja...

...today would be a good day to start your catechism (although I doubt any classes start today; the priests are kind of busy!). I do not care much for the 'retro' portions of the Mass, I thought it unnecessary but can appreciate why they did it. And in defense of the priesthood (NOT the pedophiles, mind you!), less than 1% of American Catholic priests have even be ACCUSED of inappropriate acts w/ children. The media - as usual - would have you belive that just about ALL priests are lurking outside your children's window. In the over-sexualized, morally-degrading USA I'm surprised it's that low; thank God for the devoted, chaste, devout men that lead our flocks. Standing for one's beliefs is not an easy road in America's current attack on Christianity.

Recent Comments