It’s a tough time for Jews

Cal Thomas's picture

In a season in which there is very little “peace on Earth” and even less “good will towards men,” it is a particularly tough time for Jews, who may be finding it more and more difficult to tell who their real friends are.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta fired an unusually harsh salvo across the Israelis’ bow. In a speech at a Brookings Institution forum, he urged Israel to get to the “d—n table” for peace talks.

It must have escaped Panetta’s notice that the Palestinians are the ones refusing to come to the “d—n table” unless their unacceptable demands are met.

These include, depending on the day, the cessation of construction projects, even on pre-1967 Israeli land, the so-called “right of return” of “Palestinian refugees,” a concession by Israel to re-draw its borders to 1967 lines — though such borders would be completely indefensible against an inevitable attack — and the re-division of Jerusalem, which Israel rightly sees as its capital.

Meanwhile, the Palestinian side concedes almost nothing and fulfills none of its promises. Neither is it held accountable for its behavior.

Next, we heard from Howard Gutman, the U.S. ambassador to Belgium. In the ultimate case of blaming the victim, Gutman seemed to blame Israel for anti-Semitism when he spoke recently at an event hosted by the European Jewish Union.

According to The Weekly Standard, Gutman said, “A distinction should be made between traditional anti-Semitism, which should be condemned and Muslim hatred for Jews, which stems from the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.”

If Gutman had studied history, he would know that Muslim hatred of Jews predates by many centuries Israel’s 1948 rebirth as a Jewish state.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took her own jabs at Israel. She was quoted in the English edition of the Arab publication, Al-Arabiya, as saying she fears for the future of democracy in Israel and the rights of women.

Why? Because of a newspaper story that told of patterns in certain small Orthodox Israeli neighborhoods where women are required to be separate from men in certain situations, such as when taking public transportation.

In case Secretary Clinton hasn’t noticed, gender segregation has long been practiced in religiously conservative Muslim societies. Events surrounding the so-called “Arab Spring” do not encourage confidence that women will have more rights and freedom under emerging regimes than they have had under previous dictatorships.

But it is not only Jews who are being singled out for verbal abuse and physical attacks.

In last month’s Smithsonian magazine, there was a revealing story by Joshua Hammer about the stepped-up attacks by Egyptian Muslims against Coptic Christians, who trace their lineage to the time of Christ. In fact, notes Hammer, attacks against Coptic churches and individual Christians have increased since Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak was deposed.

Radical Muslims have little regard for other religious viewpoints. Arab-Israeli relations, or U.S.-Arab relations for that matter, are not likely to improve if the Muslim Brotherhood takes power in the coming election, though you won’t be able to convince the U.S. State Department of that.

In a November address to the Atlantic Council, William Taylor, the State Department’s special coordinator for Middle East transitions pronounced, “What we need to do is judge people and parties and movements on what they do, not what they’re called.”

Really? The Muslim Brotherhood’s motto is “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” Hamas, whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel, grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood. Is that good enough to conclude for everyone, except Taylor, that the Muslim Brotherhood plans to behave very badly toward Israel?

No intelligent person who has observed the media attacks against Israel (not to mention the many wars, countless terrorist incidents and continuing threats directed at Israel’s destruction) can credibly conclude that Israel’s enemies are merely hyperbolic.

Despite all the agreements, goodwill gestures and disproportionate prisoner exchanges in which Israel has released hundreds of alleged terrorists in exchange for a single captured Israeli soldier or civilian, there are people who continue to advance the fiction that only Israel stands in the way of peace.

It’s past time to stop taking potshots at Israel and start directing “fire” at the prime suspects behind continuing war and turmoil in the region.

[Cal Thomas is America’s most widely syndicated op-ed columnist, appearing in more than 600 national newspapers. He is the author of more than 10 books and is a FOX News political contributor since 1997. Email Cal Thomas at tmseditors@tribune.com.] ©2011 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

JeffC
JeffC's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/21/2006
Blatant lies but who cares

Cal Thomas knows full well that the continuation of Israel confiscating Palestinian land to build illegal settlements is the only issue and that Netenyahu has no interest in negotiating a peace deal. Despite Cal's condescending assertion, that hasn't escaped Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's notice at all.

Cal then moves on to Howard Gutman whom he characterizes as:

Cal Thomas wrote:

Next, we heard from Howard Gutman, the U.S. ambassador to Belgium. In the ultimate case of blaming the victim, Gutman seemed to blame Israel for anti-Semitism when he spoke recently at an event hosted by the European Jewish Union.

According to The Weekly Standard, Gutman said..."

Why "According to The Weekly Standard..."? Why not just "Gutman said..."? Because The Weekly Standard deliberately lied in their story in which they twisted and paraphrased Gutman's speech. Cal Thomas wanted to use the lie so he used the Weekly Standard's quote. He left Gutman with another gratuitous slap:

Cal Thomas wrote:

If Gutman had studied history...

I suspect that Howard Gutman, Harvard Law School graduate and U.S. ambassador to Belgium has studied history and also has some passing acquaintance with anti-Semitism since Gutman is Jewish, the son of a Polish Holocaust survivor.

Then Cal attacks Secretary of State Hillary Clinton because she "fears for the future of democracy in Israel and the rights of women".

Cal Thomas wrote:

... because of a newspaper story that told of patterns in certain small Orthodox Israeli neighborhoods where women are required to be separate from men in certain situations, such as when taking public transportation."

Really? In many neighborhoods, women are forced to board public buses from the back and stay there. Billboards with images of women are defaced. Public streets are cordoned off during religious holidays so that women cannot enter. Women's names were cut from organ donors lists. Scientific awards were jointly issued to men and women but the women were not invited to the ceremony. The list goes on. It seems like more than a newspaper story.

So here is what I don't get. Cal Thomas is "America’s most widely syndicated op-ed columnist, appearing in more than 600 national newspapers. He is the author of more than 10 books and is a FOX News political contributor since 1997". Why? His columns are collections of misrepresentations held together by sophomoric logic and easily proven outright lies.

Mike King
Mike King's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/29/2006
Now Jeff...

Were these two territories not controlled by Egypt and Jordan prior to the creation of Israel as a country? Perhaps my recollection of history needs a refresh, but when have the Palestinians actually been truly autonomous?

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Israeli Politics - A Quiet Secret

What Cal fails to note is that anytime Benjamin Netanyahu even breaths the words Palestinian Statehood he is treading on very thin ice with his Likud Party. The Likud charter calls for the Jordon River to become eastern border of Isreal.

Recent Comments