King, Ernst explain voting against PTC K-9 expansion

Peachtree City Councilman Terry Ernst. Photo/John Munford.

The approval to buy a second K-9 dog for the Peachtree City Police Department by the City Council April 16 came on a split 3-2 vote.

Councilmen Mike King and Terry Ernst, asked Monday about the reasoning behind their opposition, both said they felt the K-9 duty took away from time the officer could spend on cart path patrol.

Ernst and King said they were comfortable with having the one existing police K-9 unit, but they felt having two was a bit too much.

“I have nothing against the dog, and the dog we have now is great and the other dog was good,” Ernst said. “I just feel we need more officers on the cart paths and having a dog is not going to do that, by taking another officer away from the opportunity to work the cart paths.”

Ernst noted that the Fayette County and Coweta County sheriff’s offices have dogs the city can use when its K-9 unit is unavailable, and he noted that the K-9 handler at the April 16 council meeting said the dog was used an estimated three times a week for K-9 specific calls.

Ernst also said that in his experience with the police department, he felt there wasn’t enough of a need for the additional K-9 unit.

“I’m not against the dogs at all, I just don’t think we need two,” Ernst said.

King said having the second K-9 unit would prevent that assigned officer from conducting path patrols, which are important to him and to city residents. King said the second K-9 unit was a “nice to have” instead of a necessity.

King also worried about the potential cost to the city of more than the $4,000 cited by staff and the need for an extended period of training for the new K-9 dog and his handler.

“The biggest reason is we owe our citizens cart path patrols rather than we need another dog handler,” King said. “... Because it’s a 3-2 vote we’re still going to support it. You haven’t heard me or Terry carp about it.”

Husband and Fat...
Husband and Father of 2's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/23/2012
Not a big deal

According to the cities website, the last yearly police report (2012), the police averaged 3 hours a day on the paths and gave out 400 actions. Of these actions 60% were warnings. The police auxiliary also spent time policing the paths but the amount of time wasn't supplied.

If they travel 20 miles an hour on the ATV, they can hit 60 miles each day. In my mind, that's pretty good. Most of the issues probably happen after school and summer time.

Carts also must have tags, so issues can be reported.

I'd rather have a extra dog on duty most of the time and get to location in 20 minutes rather than having to wait an hour or more for a county dog or dog from another jurisdiction.

I would really like to see the police perform more license and registration checks with a dog sniffing for drugs. That would be a great deterrent and provide funding for the dog. (If it's legal).

moelarrycurly
moelarrycurly's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/17/2010
2 for the price of 1-for Ernst & King

Hey, look what I found. No reason K-9 patrol cannot do BOTH patrols...slap one of these on the back of the PD ATV

OR, put officer K-9 in the cruiser....just need to keep those pet owners with felines on leashes on the paths out of their way when they come whizzing by.....meow!

Check this out:

http://youtu.be/n1a9mmj8778

Recent Comments