Proposed tax on veterinary services will result in fewer animals helped

Dear U.S. Representative Westmoreland,

My name is Shannen Chabot and I am a 12th-grader from McIntosh High School. More importantly, I’m of voting age and I’m one of your constituents. As a pet owner and a veterinary technician, I am writing to express my concern regarding House Bill 385, the proposed pet tax.

First, no other professionals are being targeted by this legislation. No healthcare professionals, who are also service providers, are finding their practices threatened.

Medical services have long been exempt from taxation at the state and federal level. Veterinarians are subject to many of the same laws and regulations as their physician counterparts. Could you imagine the public outrage if this same proposal were extended to human medical services?

Taxing veterinary services has been proposed by several states in the past few years (CA, ME, MI, PA), and this was rejected by legislators as contrary to the best interests of citizens of those states. We need to do the same in Georgia; we need to see that this is contrary to our best interests.

In the current economy, animal owners must make difficult decisions regarding the welfare of their pets and/or horses. Adding sales tax to veterinary services may force owners to forego life-saving procedures and opt for economic euthanasia. You must not allow this possibility to occur.

According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, nearly two out of every three households have a pet, and a majority of pet owners have more than one. Perhaps you and your family have a pet? A tax on veterinary services could have a substantial financial impact on responsible veterinary care of pets.

Furthermore, I submit that should this bill pass, the public health and safety will be at risk. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), more than 80 percent of diseases in humans originate in animals. Studies show that veterinarians are most likely to identify these zoonotic diseases.

A recent nationwide study by Bayer Animal Health showed that routine veterinary checkups have declined in the past years due to the economy. Increased expenses will intensify this trend, causing pet owners to forego veterinary care. Pet abandonment will increase, and many pets will be euthanized.

Pets are often abandoned to shelters when owners can no longer afford their care. Animal shelter populations are increasing beyond capacity, yet counties are cutting budgets. In the past two years, the number of cats and dogs euthanized at animal shelters in the five core metro counties has risen 24 percent. Almost 30,000 cats and dogs were euthanized in Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton and Gwinnett counties alone last year. Rescue groups that relocate animals as alternatives to shelters and euthanasia would also be affected.

If you are a pet owner or have ever been a pet owner, you should oppose any effort to impose a tax on veterinary services.

Thank you for your consideration of these concerns and I look forward to your response.

Shannen Chabot

Peachtree City, Ga.

More Cowbelle
More Cowbelle's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/07/2010
Your Tea Party At Work

Ginger, you get what you pay for (or don't pay for). There are no free rides unless they're on the bypass going past your place.

ginga1414
ginga1414's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2008
Taxing Veterinary Services - What's Next?

Shannen Chabot is absolutely right with all of her statements. She should be commended for caring enough to write to her representative.

The ones to suffer the most are the innocent animals and the people who truly love them.

Families will have heartbroken children because they will have to give up their beloved pets.

Seniors who cling to their pets for love and companionship will have to give up their companions.

There will be more puppies and kittens abandoned to the streets.

There will be more expenses that will go toward euthanizing innocent animals.

This makes me sick!

Please write your letters, now.

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
Vet Svcs--ginga

Ahhh,'scuse me, but isn't this a bill before the GA legislature? So what would Westmoreland have do do with it? I think this might be called, "nice attack, wrong hill."

normal
normal's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/11/2009
Oh come on ginga

For a couple dollars in tax you are saying that all those folks will have to give up and/or euthanize their pets. Maybe 4 to 6 dollars per hundred spent. If you cant afford that then you shouldnt have a pet. I think these pet lovers will do whatever to take care of their pets. This tax is no big deal.

ginga1414
ginga1414's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2008
Dark Madam

I agree completely!!

DarkMadam
DarkMadam's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/25/2006
No Normal...you come on...

You love your kids right? If you have them... Some people choose not to have children. Choosing to have pets instead. Healthcare is healthcare... Taxing vet care is just one baby step to taxing healthcare on you, your children and other family members. We are taxed to death as it is. Some taxes are truly needed, most are BS (taxing vet care falls into this catagory). Lets face it, If we really ran this country like a business that could be put OUT OF BUSINESS at any time, things would change.

I say Kudos to this writer! Nuf said.

mthom5436
mthom5436's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/29/2008
Vet Taxes

On one hand I agree that it's not a lot of money. Really, I don't understand why services aren't taxes just like sales is the first place. Ont the other, I am getting tired of being nickled and dimed to death. Seven here, an extra 30 or so on my sewage where does it end?

Recent Comments