Rep. Westmoreland: Healthcare vote fundamentally alters nation

U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland

The Democrat victory on healthcare Sunday night “will fundamentally alter the nature of our nation by implementing a government takeover of healthcare that Americans don’t want and can’t afford,” said U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-Grantville).

The Democratic healthcare plan passed 219-212.

“This vote creates an expensive new entitlement that implements a government takeover of one-sixth of the American economy,” the Third District congressman said. “This law will raise taxes on all Americans, it will kill jobs in a lagging economy, it will put mandates on Americans and on businesses, it will put government in between doctors and their patients, it will raise the premiums of people who currently have insurance.

“The Democratic healthcare bill will add $2.6 trillion in new spending. There’s no free lunch,” Westmoreland said. “We’ll either tax ourselves to the point we’re not competitive internationally or we’ll simply add on more and more debt. Regardless, the bottom line is we cannot afford this new entitlement.

“We have bills that as a nation we can’t pay as it is. Now we’re adding on more stress to an overburdened system. Our debt obligations threaten to put our economy in critical care, and we’re crippling the ability of innovative Americans to create new jobs,” the former Fayette County resident said.

“There’s no doubt that there are many Americans facing tragic situations because they lack health insurance. Many more are underinsured and millions live in fear of losing their coverage. By opposing this legislation, we are not belittling or ignoring the real crisis in our nation’s health care system. Republicans have put forth responsible reforms that have fallen on deaf ears with this Democratic Congress and administration. No matter how great our desire to cover each and every American who lacks coverage, we do not serve the greater good if our actions bankrupt our nation,” Westmoreland said.

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
Finally, a Dem admits.....

...what "thinking people" (as DM would say) have known all along.

"Democratic Senator: Health Care Law to Address 'Mal-Distribution of Income'
.
FOXNews.com
.
After the Senate passed a "fix-it" bill Thursday to make changes to the new health care law, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Neb., chairman of the influential Finance Committee, said the overhaul was an "income shift" to help the poor.
.
As Democrats tout the moral underpinnings of the federal health care system overhaul -- ensuring health care coverage for nearly all Americans -- one senator appeared to go off message when he said the legislation would address the "mal-distribution of income in America."
.
After the Senate passed a "fix-it" bill Thursday to make changes to the new health care law, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the influential Finance Committee, said the overhaul was an "income shift" to help the poor.
.
"Too often, much of late, the last couple three years, the mal-distribution of income in American is gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy and the middle income class is left behind," he said. "Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America. This legislation will have the effect of addressing that mal-distribution of income in America."
.
That contrasted with the arguments Democrats have been making in the past year for reinventing the health care system: to expand health care coverage to 32 million uninsured Americans and tighten regulations on insurance companies while reducing the federal deficit.
.
But some Republican critics have suggested the overhaul is taking the country down the path to socialism. The nearly $1 trillion legislation pays for itself in large part through new taxes on the wealthy.
.
A spokeswoman for Baucus did not respond to an e-mail seeking more information on the statement.
.
Baucus' statement could give Republicans ammunition as they seek to repeal the law and regain control of Congress in the November elections.
.
Democrats have rejected Republican charges that they are trying to take over the health care system.
.
In Iowa to trumpet the benefits of the legislation, President Obama said, "We made a promise. That promise has been kept."
.
"From this day forward, all of the cynics, all the naysayers -- they're going to have to confront the reality of what this reform is and what it isn't," the president said. "They'll have to finally acknowledge this isn't a government takeover of our health care system."
.
GOP strategist Matt Schlapp, the White House director to former President George. W. Bush, told FoxNews.com that Baucus' statement reflected the "duality" of a responsible Democrat who understands the ramifications of tax policy on Americans but has a "foot in the camp of the most radical and rabid big government activists that are advocating for some breathtaking policies."
.
"It's interesting," he said. "He's not the senator I would use as the poster boy for radical and misunderstanding of market dynamics."
.
But Schlapp said he's not surprised by anything said by a member of a political party that, he said, seeks "to take money away from people who are achieving and give it those who aren’t."

Wow, a refreshing return from "Wonderland". Somebody is going to get a spanking for deviating from the rigid script the Dems have passed out.

Oh, I was going to get this from somebody besides FOX as I realize that is a lightning rod to some, but I'll be darned.....it just cannot be found on CNN or the AJC. They are busy with the bigger news stories about "24" coming to an end and Sandra Bullock's cheating husband.

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
Betcha Baucus won't

go home to Montana and talk that crap. You would think he would have learned by now that Income is NOT "distributed"---it's EARNED!

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
GYM

Is Montana where those bad dudes live in the woods in a cabin with a gun pointed out the window at all times?

Didn't they shoot it out with the FBI once? They lost, of course.

Is that what will happen to him if he goes to Montana---get shot?
Thought a fellow could vote his conscious if he wanted to do so without fear of retaliation except at the polls.

Sounds like bragging about "whut I'll do ifn aye kin" talking to a bunch of redneks.

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
Bonko, Revenue "distribution" & Montana

To infer that income is "distributed" is likened to actually believing that somewhere there is a huge pot of money and some unknown person or persons decides who should get what portion of it, based on unknown factors. Some folks have better paying jobs than others and consequently earn more. Some folks work more and harder than others and earn more. You want to put a "unequal distribution" label on that sort of income? Income caused by and earned by labor? I call that label a reach for a label to justify taking from some and giving to others. There's another label that better fits such an ideology and you know what it is. Stand by for your Social Security benefit to be reduced and "re-distributed" to someone else! Oh, and Montana is where the Congressman (for now) happenes to live. I spend some time there every yr and they don't put up with much foolishness. I suspect he'll be in trouble next election cycle.

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
Distributed income?

You have thrown me for a loop in my thinking about what happens to one's income.
If it were true that ALL income was earned, then it sure would be hard for many of those bankers, Wall Street shysters, oil execs, insurance execs, all those rich families drawing unearned dividends off of millions of shares of stocks and bonds willed to them by people who got them practically free in one fashion or another!

Banker's work 9:00to 3:00 USUALLY, IF YOU CALL THAT WORK, Wall Street comes in to work, most of the time, by noon and takes a two hour martini lunch.
Hard, hard work.

I don't think you mean "earned" money, I think you mean "fortunate" money!

Now some kinds of work (time at office) does pay better than some other real work. The very worst jobs pay the least however, and the very hardest.
Chicken gutting requires 600 guttings an hour. Hip boots are required to wade in the floor blood and guts.
Turkey slaughtering comes next in November and December, where one must grind off the complete head of a turkey every five seconds. Palin made a film in front of one of those guys once.
The slaughter of cows and sheep has civilized some in recent years, the fellow with the hammer or bolt exploder shaft is lying down overhead and they don't know what hit them. He does about 180 per hour.
Roofers can only work about ten years in the sun before cancer or back problems sets in or they fall off. They must do a large house a day. Mostly work Americans won't do at all, or if they do it takes a week, constant griping, leaks, and they make three times as much.

You know, I think being born intelligent with intelligent parents has more to do with it than anything. They are professionals and that word alone is worth $200,000 per year.

Yet, it all does get distributed----what else are people going to do with it. If you put it in a bank the invest it in bad developer deals. If you buy stock the stockseller makes good money but you may lose most of it.
If you bury it in a Mason or Kerr jar, I might find it.

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Gee MOC

Who would have thought.

Now we come to the next battle; immigration reform.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
Cyclist

Better work together on jobs first. The battle of immigration reform will be more divisive than healthcare - and California, Arizona, and Texas will be horrific battlegrounds with their large population of Latinos. Am I wrong? Liberals will want a 'reform' - Conservatives will want all illegals and their families out now! Hopefully someone will come up with a just solution.

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
Jobs vs Healthcare Insurance

Skewed priorities in my view. More jobs means more citizens who can afford to get their own healthcare insurance and won't need a Govt handout. About 14 months too late.

Cyclist
Cyclist's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2007
Davids mom,

You're right. There are several roads the demos could travel. Either one is laced with issues and the mid terms are just over 7 months away. This will be interesting.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
HOW HEALTH CARE REFORM WILL ROLL OUT

HOW HEALTH CARE REFORM WILL ROLL OUT
(Time Magazine)

2010
• The Uninsured: Receive immediate access to coverage through high-risk pools if they are uninsured because of pre-existing conditions; children can remain on parents’ plans until they are 26.

•Insurers: Barred from removing coverage when a person gets sick, denying coverage to kids with pre-existing conditions and imposing lifetime coverage caps.

• Employers: Small businesses can receive tax credits to purchase insurance for employees

• Medicare Prescription-Drug Beneficiaries: Receive a $250 rebate when they hit the ‘doughnut’ hole’ gap in drug coverage (currently when enrollees pass $2,700 in costs, they lose coverage until they reach $6,154.)

2011
• Insurers: Required to spend at least 80% of premiums on medical services

• Medicare Prescription-Drug beneficiaries: Receive a 50% discount on brand- name drugs while in the doughnut hole.

2013
Taxpayers: Medicare payroll taxes increase and expand to include unearned income for individuals making more than $200,000 and families earning more than $250,000.

2014
The Uninsured: Most Americans are required to get covered or pay a penalty; families can receive subsidies to buy insurance if they earn up to four times the federal poverty level (currently a bout $88,000 a year); individuals and small businesses can buy packages through state exchanges.

Insurers: Prohibited from refusing to sell policies and limited in their ability to set prices on the basis of health status.

Employers: Businesses with 50 or more employees must provide coverage or pay a penalty.

2018
Taxpayers: High-cost employer-provided policies ($27,500)for family or $10,200 for single coverage are subject to a 40% excise tax.

2020
Medicare Prescription-Drug Beneficiaries: The prescription-drug coverage gap is eliminated

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
GAltant

Your post deserves a decent response. I have been slammed today and have apparently been very popular on this blog (as in being called out). I have to finish some things up and head to a hockey game. I will reply to you tomorrow.

bladderq
bladderq's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/02/2005
Westmoron

How do other industrialized nations provide care and still compete? Why is the USA the only country not providing care? Not 1 Republican was ever concerned that not 1 red cent of Bush's worthless war in Iraq was funded. Every nickel went to the deficit. I only want the insurance he and Cheney have.

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
Insurance envy

"I only want the insurance he and Cheney have."

Well, they got it by winning an election. Oh I get it, you just want it given to you. The liberal way.....

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
MOC

Well, they got it by winning an election.

NO!! They got it by working hard in school, in their communities, etc. - and then being elected! No one gave it to them. They got it THE AMERICAN WAY! Now we have persons/citizens who have worked hard, etc. - and are without health insurance, without jobs, etc. Is your brand of conservatism so shallow that you can't understand that?

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
DM

"Is your brand of conservatism so shallow that you can't understand that?"

Well DM, feeding off that opener....is your reading comprehension level so low that you can't understand what was said there?

See bladder said: "I only want the insurance he and Cheney have.

I basically said they got that insurance by going through the process of getting elected to a job that had those perks. He has not won that same election and just wants those same insurance benefits.

See, it is a given that they worked hard. It is a given that they went to school. It is a given that those benefits were not just given to them. It is a given that that is The American Way. Well, it used to be anyway. THAT WAS THE POINT. He has not done all those things they did in order to get those benefits. He just wanted them.

As for your question, yes I know some people have worked hard and lost jobs. The point has always been, we are in no financial position to take on that massive entitlement. Believe all that BS about deficit reduction and cost savings you want. No government entitlement program ever costs what they estimate. No government entitlement program is ever audited to verify promised savings. Still think I'm shallow? I could care less.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
MOC

It's a blessing that your shallowness is in the minority. Have a blessed day.

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
DM

My, you sure got feisty and high and mighty since the health care joke passed. Don't dish it out of you can't take it.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
Feisty?

I haven't changed. No need to get 'high and mighty' - the bill passed! Now on to the next challenge - JOBS!! I don't think the Republicans can continue the 'just say no' rhetoric on that one. Good debate and working together for the American people will help Dems and Repubs in November - otherwise, there may be more 'unemployed' leaving D.C.

Don't dish it out of you can't take it. I've forgotten more than you have the ability to dish out!! :-)

Joe Kawfi
Joe Kawfi's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/20/2009
Mean Old....

She always does that when she loses an argument.......

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
Kawfi

Another example of your superior analytical skills. :-)

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
A picture comes to mind

after reading the exchange between MOC, Kawfi, DM: :-) Won't share it.

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
MOC

I think many "got it" also by winning an election over a year ago!

Do you not understand the premise that 310,000,000 US citizens can't all "work hard" as you say and end up well off with good health insurance and a good house and a good car and good clothes and a good education at any college?

What are we to do with them? Let them riot sometime?

Does not all taxes ultimately get passed on to the taxpayer in the form of cost of goods and services sold? Even the interest we pay on Reagan's and Bush's deficit! Due to so many deductions nowadays, most people pay less taxes now than over the past.

I still say your exact problem is not excess taxes you pay, but the help some get who can't pay for all of it! You don't like that due to their attitude.

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
Bonker$

No, I really don't understand the premise that everybody can't work hard. Meaning those physically and mentally capable. By the way, that last part would excuse you.

What are you still doing moralizing here Bonker$? You are a proven liar on these blogs. You have ZERO CREDIBILITY. You said you voted for McCain in 2008. You said later you didn't vote for McCain in 2008. Then when caught, you tried to weasel out of it. You took yourself out of the moralizing game when you LIED. Proven liars don't get to moralize, and when they try nobody listens. Get used to it old man.

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
MOC

I took myself out of nothing! I told you what happened.

You are complaining about a minor issue to cover up a decent answer to problems!
Same as the mixture of Tea People.

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
Bonker$

Oh yeah, you took yourself right out of the moralization squad. You got caught LYING. Then like a coward, you tried weaseling out of it. That made it even worse. Had you been a man, had you been an adult, and just said "well, you guys caught me. I guess I have to be more careful with my future lies" it would have blown over. But, no. You are a caught LIAR and it is obviously killing you. Otherwise, you would not keep talking about it and trying to deny it.

See Bonker$, again, here is your achilles heel:

"Mike: Facts
Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 10/29/2008 - 2:39pm.
Mike, I am an Independent and have already voted for John McCain this time. I supported him the last time he ran. I also voted for Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. I did not vote for Reagan. I voted for Eisenhower and Truman. I didn't vote for Chambliss this time.
McCain can get more done in the area of health care, education, and our debt than could Obama.

And then some 17 months later:

"MOC
Submitted by Bonkers on Sat, 03/20/2010 - 7:41am.
You are confused. I could never vote for Palin in any capacity. I have made it clear several times I did not vote for McCain the last time.

Let me help you sift through it. On the first one you said "..I am an Independent and have already voted for John McCain this time. Again, this date was during the early voting period. And, you go on to stipulate that you "supported him the last time he ran". That blows that weak, specious excuse you offered up right out of the water.

Then, less than a week ago you said "..I did not vote for McCain the last time".

Flat out lie. One of the two. Which is it? It doesn't even matter.

hutch866
hutch866's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2005
Bonker$

While I agree your credibility is a minor issue, I would like to clear something up, you say you voted for Obama, was that a lie or was this a lie...
Submitted by Bonkers on Tue, 08/19/2008 - 11:16am.

Pretty weak criticism of Obama here. I will not vote for Obama but I will defend him when he is correct.

or this...
Submitted by Bonkers on Thu, 08/21/2008 - 12:00pm.

Has everyone nearly gone bonkers on here?
You obviously have Obama mixed up with some other minorities that you don't like! I'm not voting for him because he needs to prove himself a few more years, and that only

or this one, this one is one of my favorites...
Submitted by Bonkers on Sat, 10/17/2009 - 4:50am.

Muddle uses BB term. (subs for cussing).

Nobody questions Lincoln and nobody should question Obama. Then why do you?

Newspapers say? And old one of 1961 announced Obama's birth.
Are you speaking of todays papers doubting Obama's birth? I kinda agree (like FOX) anything newspapers print as they die is questinable.

So his Mother didn't look pregnant in a picture (what month, time) and what 64 and 80 BC didn't acknowledge him?

From the gitgo lying and bowing to Kings do look most bad! If they had happened.

Hey, I voted for McCain but Obama is the President!

You sound somewhat flaggelated, disturbed, mixed-up, conning, and ridiculous. When will Judge Carter (whomever he or she is) certify you? No discovery required.

Now you get back to me on this bonk$, let me know just which lie is the lie, then we'll talk about that credibility thingy again.

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
hutch

You are "hung-up like MOC, I see!

I'll say it one more time and then ignore the subject. Most of your comments above make no sense whatsoever as they are out of context.

I intended to vote for McCain in 2008 and did help him in his previous primary!
However, when John exhibited senility and inability to function in the job, I could not.
The Palin choice affirmed his problems.

I voted for Obama in the last election. There were only two choices!
He is now the President whether you like it or not, and will win again next time unless the foolishness by the conservatives and splinter groups (radicals) stops.
Being against the health plan and predicting the end of the world about socialism only indicates to most the foolishness by the fringe of what are really the needs of the country.

hutch866
hutch866's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2005
Bonker$

By all means put it in context, of course you can't, because you lied , like you're lying now, so go ahead and ignore you LIAR. Feel free to prove I'm lying if you can. Of course you can't.

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
hutch: liars

Prove you are a liar?
I have no need to do that! Anyway a lot of talk doesn't prove anything.
Only you know if that is true.
Is lying the same as bearing false witness?
If a person doesn't know they are lying due to context or ignorance, is that critical?
If a person wants to believe that they are not lying, could they still be?
Is calling the entire House of Representatives, "baby killers,' lying?

If there is a killing, would't that be the hospital and the individual, and that makes it a personal thing....none of your business. (religious interference again).

The Chinese Buddhists killed all girl babies (drowned them, like cats) for a long time to control population. So may people, many were starving! Yet, I never heard you or any like you call them that!

The government's job is to pass laws to protect the American Citizens, leaving them all the rights to do as they please as long as it doesn't seriously harm others.
Good health plans do not seriously harm others, just the opposition party.

bladderq
bladderq's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/02/2005
? Win an election

So if you win an election.. you get top tier coverage? Is that your perception of democracy? The other misconception is that the USA has the "Best" healthcare. It'll be OK. Just take a deep breath. I am optomistic that now that this is behind us we'll move on to the other parts of the agenda. Too bad the vote wasn't take last summer. My prediction is that the Dems will do better than predicted (today) in Nov.
No Repub has cover on voting for a war with no funding adding to the deficit and helping No One.

meanoldconservatives
meanoldconservatives's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/09/2008
bladder

"So if you win an election.. you get top tier coverage? Is that your perception of democracy?"

Actually, it is not a perception at all. It is called REALITY. A place you obviously don't care to visit often. I have an idea for you bladder. Since your Dems are in control now, why don't you ask them to drop their top tier coverage and join us normal people or just give us all what they have??? I mean, since money is no object let's all get some health care bling. Wouldn't that be your perception of democracy? Keep us all informed on your progress with that....

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
Check the facts MOC

just give us all what they have???

Please read what is in the bill. There will be those who will get exactly what our Congressmen have!

See what our Congressmen get - and compare to what is offered in health care plan

The Wedge
The Wedge's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/09/2008
they do what we will be doing

It is called keeping costs down by rationing. Let's look at those countries:
In France, assessment of medical products is done by the Committee for the Evaluation of Medicines. Reimbursement rates are set by the National Union of Sickness Insurance Funds, a group that also negotiates pay to doctors

In Germany, the Federal Joint Committee regulates reimbursement and restrictions on prescribing, while the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare does formal cost-effectiveness analysis. The Social Insurance Organization, technically a part of the Federal Joint Committee, is in charge of setting prices through a defined formula that monitors doctors' prescribing behavior and sets their practice budgets. In the past 12 months, the 15 medical products and services that cleared this process spent an average 35 months under review. (The shortest review was 19 months, the longest 51.)

Does that help you in your analysis? We will get there. It will be a single payer system before too long and then we can experience what many of the other industrialized countries experience.

bladderq
bladderq's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/02/2005
Future Experience

Is there a shortage of doctors in FR or GR? How about nurses? Why did American doctors, AARP & Catholic hospitals support yesterday's vote? Follow the money. Who spent the most to stop this bill? Did that money have the average person's interest at heart? Bring on single payer; that's why Rush wanted to move to Costa Rica until he discovered that his narcotics wouldn't be covered at the qtys he requires. Republicans from Teddy Roosevelt to Richard Nixon have tried to pass this bill.

S. Lindsey
S. Lindsey's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2008
Uhh Yes.. There is a shortage of Doctors

in those Countries.. They come here for our Capitalist system.. But I guess they will soon go back..

Those others you mentioned have a vested interest.. Take the AARP.. they sell gap insurance and stand to make BILLIONs... Social Justice is good for all but the American People..

bladderq
bladderq's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/02/2005
AARP & $

AARP is going to make billions off my $12/yr membership? Gee, hadn't read that one yet. Will it be free to join? How do you explain the doctors & Catholic hospitals supporting this bill? My guess is they want to get paid. Maybe paid something. I've had a couple of Cuban refugee doctors. I've had a Asian Indian engineer turned neurologist. My daughter saw a couple of African cardios; but haven't run across any French, German, Canadian or English ones yet, I'm sure they are as competent as the others mentioned.

NUK_1
NUK_1's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/17/2007
AARP just plainly sucks

I don't know how else to put it. When it comes to hysterical lying and fear-mongering, the AARP is the pre-eminent special interest group out there. Yes, even over the environmental whacko's that were predicting in the 1960's and early 70's a global ice age or forced abortion/sterilization to head off an overpopulation crisis that never happened, but who also are comfortably entriched in mainstream "progressive liberalism" despite the fact that they were beyond wrong.

It's bad enough that a lot of religious groups prey on seniors, but what the AARP does with their misinformation and blatant dishonesty is beyond that. It's not about seniors with the AARP; it's a totally political kludge that makes a lot of people in this country take an unfavorable view of our senior citizens.

Between the loser teacher unions and the AARP, I'd go with the AARP as being more damaging to this country. They take advantage and exploit those in society who are vulnerable while it's our own damn fault that we let groups like the NEA ever reach anything resembling power by default because we were too lazy to raise our own children.

Some of the insurance products and gap coverage the AARP touts endlessly are worse than title loans or payday lending. When it comes to legal loan-sharking and screwing over the people they are supposed to represent, organized crime has nothing on the AARP.

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
AARP

Regardless of your experience with AARP - they did not introduce the DEATH PANELS concept. Talk about fear mongering!!

bladderq
bladderq's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/02/2005
AARP Discounts

You are missing out some good discounts. They still couldn't beat my car insurance. 15 yrs of loyalty I guess has its rewards.
Teacher union.. you know there isn't one in GA... right? You know the teachers turned on Barnes & put Sonny in.. right? They regret it but...

S. Lindsey
S. Lindsey's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2008
I think Bonkers found a new personality

just saying...

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
lindsey

Never have known what "just saying" means! If you don't say it, then it has no meaning!

Anyway, what are you talking about? "New personality?
And to what does it refer?

I don't have time to research such stuff!

S. Lindsey
S. Lindsey's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2008
I guess you have issues with reading...

Didn't I say they sell GAP INSURANCE... Didn't the DEMS just PLEDGE to cut A HALF A TRILLION from the program... Guess who steps in to fill the GAP.. Yep AARP.. Get it now?

"The Congressional Budget Office has previously estimated that the cuts to Medicare Advantage plans proposed in Democrats’ government takeover of health care (H.R. 3200) would cause millions of seniors to lose their current plan and enroll in government-run Medicare.
* Because the government-run Medicare benefit is less generous than most private health plans, the independent Medicare Payment Advisory Commission found in June that more than nine in ten seniors not in nursing home settings utilize some form of Medicare supplemental insurance. While many of these individuals currently rely on Medicare Advantage plans for the extra benefits they provide to seniors, many would be forced to purchase supplemental Medigap policies should their existing Medicare Advantage plans be taken away from them due to Democrats’ government takeover of health care."

Davids mom
Davids mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/30/2005
SL -

. . another 'just saying' comment.

While many of these individuals currently rely on Medicare Advantage plans for the extra benefits they provide to seniors, many would be forced to purchase supplemental Medigap policies should their existing Medicare Advantage plans be taken away from them due to Democrats’ government takeover of health care."

Care to elaborate - using 'facts'?

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
AARP---Besides what Steve said...the AARP

is a hard-core LIBERAL organization! Took me a few years to figure it out, but I scrapped my membership 3 yrs ago.

Bonkers
Bonkers's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/01/2010
Rep. Westmoreland?

Did I see where Westmoreland didn't even vote on this bill? It was in a list of who voted for what on the bill.

This is a prime case of voting primarily to be able to stay in office. Without a doubt if Westmoreland had voted yes, he would have been defeated in his next election try. He wouldn't even be nominated. His district has no use for democratic programs or current Presidents.

It is about power, not whether the country may go broke.
It also will be paid for by devastating all of the excessive medical and medicine charges currently being done by the insurance companies and their cooperative providers, and by a 1% increase on some workers in the payroll tax----- later. Do you know how much money 1% is of all labor or profits performed and done in the USA?
So much it can't be calculated as of yet.

Actually, most conservatives actually want this program for Americans, they simply can't say so and get reelected. One term is needed badly!