Brown pledges public hearings on stormwater fees

To address citizens’ concerns over the new stormwater fee bills sent out last month to all property owners in unincorporated Fayette County, the county commission plans to host several public meetings in the near future.

Commission Chairman Steve Brown said last week that each person who got a bill will soon get an invitation to attend those meetings with a goal of “discussing the problems with the county’s stormwater infrastructure, where we intend to go and how you would like us to address it.”

Brown said he has spoken with at least 300 people concerned about the bills. Some citizens have threatened they will not pay their stormwater bill.

And even though he voted against the creation of the stormwater utility, Brown said he sees the need for the county to address stormwater infrastructure, particularly in the case of crumbling corrugated metal pipes that threaten to collapse roads.

“We’ve got to do something,” Brown said, noting that there are not enough funds available in the regular county budget to replace all the necessary pipes.

Commissioner Allen McCarty, who joined Brown in voting against the stormwater utility a year ago, agreed with Brown’s assessment that the county was having to play catch-up for work not done in the past.

“We will do our best to come up with a resolution to this problem,” McCarty said.

A plan from local resident and environmental activist Dennis Chase goes one step further. In a letter read by fellow resident Steve Smithfield to the commission last week, Chase argues that the commission should cancel its contract with Integrated Science and Engineering for stormwater services.

Resident Tom Waller suggested to the commission that the stormwater tax is truly a rainwater tax.

“This is an increase in our taxes,” Waller said, adding that he worried a “sunshine tax” might be next “because the sun shines down on the county and causes grass and bushes to grow alongside the road and the county has to cut them.”

Waller said if additional money was needed for stormwater services, taxes should be increased.

ginga1414
ginga1414's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2008
Stormwater Town Hall Meetings & Dates

On the county website there is a "PUBLIC NOTICE" concerning the Stormwater Utility Town Hall Meetings from Commission Chairman Steve Brown "on behalf of the 2013 Board of Commissioners."

LOCATION: Commission Chambers at 140 Stonewall Ave. Fayetteville
MEETING DATES: February 13, March 4, and March 25
TIME: 7:00 p.m.

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
Stormwater Infrastructure, Stormwater Management & Budget

A stated function of the Road Dept, Public Works is "Stormwater Infrastructure Repairs"--unless I misread it, the Road Dept had a 2012 Budget of $4,201,573! Big bucks and did they not replace one single culvert? Stormwater Management had a budget of $329,845--was that alljust for salaries?

S. Lindsey
S. Lindsey's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2008
Additionally AHG

We need to look at that budget and see where those dollars are going BEFORE we add a new TAX on us.

WE might have to pay "something" but I want to know that my Tax dollars are being spent on what they where intended to be spent on... I can't audit Washington but I sure as heck can audit Fayette County.

lblanks
lblanks's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/17/2006
Reason They Don't Call It A Tax....

It's my understanding that if they call this a tax, then all properties normally exempt from taxes wouldn't be required to pay. Most of these have large parking lots that contribute to a good deal of the run off. I believe Government offices, Churches, etc. are being billed under similar criteria as homeowners.

AtHomeGym
AtHomeGym's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2007
LBlanks & Runoff

But the size/sq ft of impervious surface isn't a good yardstick--WHERE DOES THE RUNOFF GO? That's the real issue and they don't have a clue! It's the 'one size fits all' concept or I prefer 'mass punishment'.

rmoc
rmoc's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/22/2006
Stormwater..little bill..big pain to pay

I would rather pay this with my taxes, the money involved in sending these out is ridiculous and the small amount is irritating for those of us who don't write checks anymore.